tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5097696966167161674.post7527838397374726476..comments2010-11-10T10:17:47.848-08:00Mariahhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09717508531794045622noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5097696966167161674.post-54338262264940711702010-11-10T10:17:47.848-08:002010-11-10T10:17:47.848-08:00I&#39;m late to the party but I&#39;m going to side with Anonymous. No, you can&#39;t compare apples to oranges, but one supposes you&#39;re using the same scale when comparing your restaurants otherwise what&#39;s the point? <br /><br />You&#39;ve lost me before I even started.Trianahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14995092524267153799noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5097696966167161674.post-24711448973715505482008-05-27T07:39:00.000-07:002008-05-27T07:39:00.000-07:00Ok Anonymous, when you rate restaurants you can't compare appples to oranges. Wink is a high end gourmet fusion restaurant. Hula hut is a mid-range casual dining restaurant. The quality, atmosphere, expectations, etc are going to be different for each establishment. For a mid-range dining experience Hula Hut is a 10! For high end dining experience, Wink is great, the best in Austin, in my opinion, but I've been to better in other cities, hence they 9.5Mariahhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09717508531794045622noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5097696966167161674.post-76690974381544513702008-05-24T13:22:00.000-07:002008-05-24T13:22:00.000-07:00Hula Hut a 10 and Wink a 9.5??? Ohhh, Mariah...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com